Thursday, September 14, 2017 12:35:57 AM
You conceded to another posters logic (mine) and admitted that SFOR would indeed end up with some money out of a 10m settlement.
My point was to avoid treble damages they have to pony up a larger settlement.
How much larger? 3x sounds reasonable since they are trying to avoid treble damages.
Are you aware DUO was in communication with SFOR before launching (perhaps I'm thinking of a different infringer, but it was one of them) Some of the communication is very damning in regards to willful infringement.
Recent ZRFY News
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/16/2024 07:03:19 PM
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Files for OTCQB Uplisting, Provides Financial Update • ELEM • Jun 11, 2024 9:25 AM
Southern Silver Announces Updated PEA on Cerro Las Minitas: US$501M After-tax NPV5%; 21% IRR; 48 Month payback • SSV • Jun 11, 2024 5:26 AM
Swifty Global Announces South African Gambling License Approval • DRCR • Jun 10, 2024 9:15 AM
DaBaby and Stunna 4 Vegas's "NO DRIBBLE" Joins Music Licensing, Inc.'s Portfolio • SONGD • Jun 7, 2024 10:15 AM