InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 2739
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/23/2009

Re: fiat123 post# 180161

Wednesday, 09/13/2017 9:38:32 AM

Wednesday, September 13, 2017 9:38:32 AM

Post# of 235061
Based on what you state on this post. Is it possible that even if r&g or BR can prove infringement on behalf of SFOR that the judge will not award sfor anything and instead take there patent and give it to these other companies to use since sfor proved that they cannot do anything with these patents but screw shareholders and than go after companies who were able to do something with those patents.

Infringment or not if I was the judge and I looked at the history of this company, with all there reverse splits, there lavish compensations while at the same time never producing any revenue. I as judge would conclude this company as not deserving of any kind of settlement funds. And thus would even (if possible) take the patents away from them as to not allow them to scam people any longer just because they have patents.

Think about it, never revenues while others made millions with there patents. Also paying themselves an exuberant amount of money and not making any money as a company. And rsing five times. All in the name of WE HAVE PATENTS lol. If that is not a perfect scam I don't what is. I would even look at maybe possible jail time jmo. Hope again that my presumption is proven 100 percent wrong.