InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 144
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: ralphey post# 113574

Monday, 09/04/2017 11:35:10 AM

Monday, September 04, 2017 11:35:10 AM

Post# of 426330
r-

In statin naive patients there may have been much better potential for success than in patients already taking - and success here would have opened the door for direct competition against statins

THIS IS A MAJOR FLAW AND MAY COST INVESTORS HUGELY



If R-IT is with statin naive patients and successful: Would you (prescribers) like (have enough proof) to subscribe V as add-in for patients already taking statin? Or not?

If R-IT is with statin naive patients and successful: Would you (prescribers) like (have enough proof) to subscribe V instead of statin? Or not?

If R-IT (as it is) is successful: Would you (prescribers) like (have enough proof) to subscribe V for statin naive patients? Or not?

If you answer honestly, you will know why is the design (patients already taking statin) what it is.

Best,
G

#NEWMIAMI

Disclosure:
I am long with this stock. I wrote this post myself, and it expresses my own opinions (IMHO). I am not receiving compensation for it.

Do Your Job

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News