InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 617
Posts 93684
Boards Moderated 8
Alias Born 11/01/2006

Re: martin33 post# 48509

Friday, 09/01/2017 9:56:18 AM

Friday, September 01, 2017 9:56:18 AM

Post# of 80817
LOL

There easily could be an agreement between the parties that they can not reveal what has been finalized in their AMICABLE SETTLEMENT

That would be a stipulation that would have been part of the settlement, would it not?

And even if, for some really strange reason, the parties decided to make that agreement outside of the ruling, Walther is free to divulge that fact.

More excuses. Why not let Walther come up with his own excuses and relate them to the shareholders?

You can lead a horse to water. But you can't make him get down on one knee and do an Al Jolson impression!