Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[PatentGuy1]

Impossible to leak a scientific analysis without it coming back to LQMT nor would anyone publish such a claim if it is not backed up by those who originated the claim.
And again Risk losing Apple or worse getting finned $50 million for revealing 1 Apple secret.

First, all LQMT need do is do the analysis themselves and then leak the results. Virtually every university could easily verify the results using X-Ray diffraction. A relatively ubiquitous and inexpensive test. Some tear down lab would be interested in being the first to report that information.

Second, where are you getting the "fined $50 million for revealing 1 Apple secret"? I cannot find such a penalty in the MTA. The closest that I have found is that the Apple-GTAT agreement included a $50 Million penalty for "leaking future product information." (http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/10/13/apples-supplier-contracts-include-50m-penalty-for-leaking-future-product-info) A tear down of a publicly released product is not revealing trade secrets nor leaking future product information because the product had to be publicly released in order to do the tear down.

From a business relationship point of view, I would recommend against LQMT having their finger prints on any such analysis, but I don't see how it would subject them to a $50 Million fine. Can you provide a link?