Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[rafunrafun]

I find it amusing that after Ralphie said earlier this week that he doesn't think that vascepa is effective, he STILL hasn't been able to provide any substantive reasoning to defend his point of view.

One failed attempt at such was a story about his 'patient' whose TG dropped and then came back to where it was originally (and that is based on ONE BLOOD TEST). This, ladies and gentlemen, is proof that vascepa does not work - and now onto search for Bigfoot.

But here is the kicker, he ALSO writes that in his 'experience', vascepa reduces TG by approximately 25%, on average. This is where common sense should kick in.... If you believe about the 25% reduction, doesn't that mean that one guy from the example above is an outlier?! So what the heck is the purpose of writing about this ONE outlier? Why not write about the average of the so-called 300 patients and the 25% reduction of TG?

I don't mind opposing viewpoints. I actually welcome them because they may help me to rethink about my investment. But this is absolute nonsense. No substance whatsoever.

Put up a well-reasoned argument. Defend your position with logic and substance, and not empty rhetoric and fear-mongering.

To summarize why vascepa doesn't work:

-out of 300 patience prescribed it, their average TG reduction is 25%

-this one guy's TG went back to where it was originally, via 1 Test

-the end.