InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1763
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/24/2017

Re: None

Thursday, 08/24/2017 9:11:28 AM

Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:11:28 AM

Post# of 52915
CHARTS SHOWING A ANTICIPATED MOVE UP! MACD INTERSECT YESTERDAY! RSI on the rise! GOOD SIGN OF THINGS TO COME! SOLID HISTORICAL INDICATOR!

In my opinion, today we should see nothing less than flat and very possibly a slight move up into the green for what is setting up for foreseeable and predictable positive upcomming gains. The last two weeks of MACD charting shows the trending movement toward positive territory with an intersect yesterday. So today is the day to see if the MACD actually crosses over (good historical BUY signal for this stock). There are no bombshell catalyst right now so don't expect any soaring SP rather nice healthy steady movement over the next couple of weeks so long as we see the MACD crossover today or latest by tomorrow. That is unless there's positive PRs, announcements of JVs, MoneyTV interview, WeedTV update, etc. What we should start to see now that the 10Q has been delivered and digested and investors have been provided visual video update of GreenLeaf progress is simple healthy steady recovery in SP in my opinion.

I spent a considerable amount of time last night reading about a particular sceptic of this company. Went back to an article published in 2014 that recommended 5 stocks to watch. Funny that I studied these highlighted plays and 4 of the 5 since the article have dropped significantly (rather devastatingly over the course of 2014 and heavily to current time today. 3 of the 5 are in the triple decimal range (e.g., .004) today and were .10 plus when recommended to watch. Only 1 basically has held and is showing slight decline since 2014. I have 2 points on this:

1. Those that argue PNTV's historical performance is indicative of what the company will be in the future may be very wrong and should take a hard look in the mirror at some of their own past observations made to potential investors and actual factual provable results that followed.

2. Those that have made past documented investment observations resulting in real people making the decision to invest based on that "trustworthy expert" advice and then losing their shirts trusting their "expert advice" should consider demonstrating a little more forgiveness to the company they are being critical of.

I find my readings last night simply ironic that there are those who feel compelled to present a less than stellar view of PNTV to existing and new potential investors when their own past track record is mottled with incorrect observations and predictions. Bottom line is "READER BEWARE". I feel compelled to use that statement as I have seen posts with the tag line "BUYER BEWARE". The road goes both ways. Do your research on the company and do your research on those pointing out the negative aspects of the company before making your own personal informed decision that is right for you. The internet allows us an amazing look into past documented blog statements and articles within the public domain to digest and make our own conclusions.

I wish you all the best of luck but in the case of PNTV, luck will not be needed so save it for another play. THIS ONE IS A WINNER FOR THOSE WHO ARE PATIENT AND STAY THE COURSE. Just my humble opinion. smile

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.