InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 347
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2017

Re: None

Tuesday, 08/22/2017 3:03:51 PM

Tuesday, August 22, 2017 3:03:51 PM

Post# of 52915
It's someone else's weed they've to buy. That same company they got it from started the same time as Pntv. And how many others. In 2014 when Nevada gave out the temporary licenses. Was it the last video they told shareholders they where pressing rosin out to the tune of 35k a day and now it's taking 60 days to make 200k. If 75% of the 35k went for cost and taxs they still be making 525k in 60 days. Weedtv made videos on moneytv and others shows how it went live in 2014 and now just hired someone to get it up and running. (In the new video the guy tells everyone dispensaries want nothing to do with it) Tells shareholders they have 7mil lined up to build a 1.7mil grow opt. Puts out a Pr of buying 14mil shares of stock but leaves out the other 14mil in warrants that was in the deal. (28mil for under .05) There's a pattern of it. Now I under stand why the investor had a stipulation that they had the right to get rid of Mark in the deal. Talk big and deliver small. There milking shareholders.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.