InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 5716
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/21/2005

Re: es1 post# 159156

Monday, 08/21/2017 11:28:25 AM

Monday, August 21, 2017 11:28:25 AM

Post# of 165854
So Dan took someone else's money? Really? none of that money was his? His attempt to recoup his investment and repay the pension fund makes him the same as Scott Keevil and Drew Currah neither of whom had their own money invested and put together a pump and dump scheme?

Interesting how a scam artist now means someone investing their own money or someone else's for a return, seeing that investment reduced by over 1/2, putting together a group to get rid of the true problems inside the company, and hopefully moving the company forward to recoup his and longs investment

I posted the definition of scam artist, so someone please show me how Dan meets that definition and where the pump and dump was that Currah and Keevil initiated?

So yes, Dan violated the law and is being prosecuted. He also stepped into a very negative situation to try and recoup that investment with what still appears to be a world class Niobium deposit. His legal actions have no or very little bearing on the sp or the company for if he loses and the shares are sold on the open market that costs the shareholders .01 or less. Most shareholders are willing to take that risk as there isn't much more harm that can be done