Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[AlphaInvestor8]

That's great, I am glad you finally accept that my view was correct.

No one debated that there weren't claims that made it through. The point was always about materiality - its amazing that I have to keep EXPLAINING such simple concepts repeatedly

1. Only six claims remain, not 12 not 8 as you commented and suggest I was incorrect. I was CORRECT WITH SIX

2. I provide links to press releases with the CEO's own words to this affect.

3. Having the 'same claim' on a different patent does not mean more 'claims' got through, it mean the same claim on a different patent got through, meaning if its killed on one, its killed on all. Double counting claims is silly.

4. If you don't beleive me on #3 I sugggest you pull up the patents and read the actual claims, when you see the exact same verbiage, you will realize there are only 6 "real / independent" claims remaining not 12, not 8. The same verbiage = same claim. A different number for indentical verbiage and funcationality does not mean it is a different claim with funcationality sir. I have read the claims, I would suggest you and all here do so as well.

5. Materiality matters, how much revenue is attributable to the remaining claims is key and always has been not how many got through.

6. The only time 'how many' got through mattered was day 1, when if all 50 got through it would be easy to ASSUME a large payout

7. Now that 6 are through, it very well could mean peanuts.

Thanks