InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 813
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2017

Re: PatentPlays post# 26078

Wednesday, 08/16/2017 10:36:50 PM

Wednesday, August 16, 2017 10:36:50 PM

Post# of 46519
Great enhanced damages!- ENHANCED DAMAGES OF AN IMAGINED NUMBER?

Is that really your response sir?

1. You have proven you have no factual basis for your $300 mil number, and have admitted you basically made it up out of thin air

2. I suggest this is not a valid way to estimate upside. If you think it is, I suggest you learn about how sell side analysts come up with price targets. They actually use factual information to come to an estimation not just 'guess' at a number, which you have admitted doing here

3. Three times or enhanced damages off an imaginary number does not make that number more valid, it makes it 3x more invalid


4. Great, $5 x 3 = $15 that's what the patents are worth according to my imaginary numbers

Real debate on real facts is hard I know, but that's why I push and ask questions, if those who are making up numbers are claiming knowledge, when you cannot back it up in fact (ie evidence that the value accruing to ATVI from the use of those patents would lead to $300 mil well that $300 mil number is not 'real' in any sense is it?)

I am not sure why you think talking about enhanced damages somehow supports your view of an imaginary number, it does not.