Sunday, August 13, 2017 3:59:45 AM
"The court ruling means that the allegations in the post were not only incorrect, but libelous and defamatory."
I'm assuming that you're referring to the ruling requiring compliance on the part of the Non-Party.
1. It says that the other posts are not defamatory. It may be logical to conclude from that that the post in question IS defamatory but that legal issue actually remains to be decided, doesn't it? (One would think that that was the basis for the decision, but.....)
2. I haven't seen the original motion that the Court has ruled on, but the language of the ruling has a second wrinkle in it. It seems to be requiring the provision of the post itself, perhaps to formalize the record, and doesn't specifically call for the ID info of the poster.
Have you seen the motion or do you know where I might find it? It would clear these things up for me.
But can it core A apple?
Yes Ralph, of course it can core A apple.
FEATURED Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Name Change to NuVibe, Inc. and Initiation of Ticker Symbol Application Process • KGKG • Apr 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM