InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 4298
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/14/2016

Re: CyberS post# 174946

Thursday, 08/03/2017 4:09:24 PM

Thursday, August 03, 2017 4:09:24 PM

Post# of 235076
I didn't question it, I said theyre currently not eligible for use in the govt. What you posted doesnt say anything about sfor products going into the govt, But I can show you Exactly why they cant

Here is the US GENERAL SERVICES ADMIN APPROVED MANUFACTURES LISTS
You know the same US general Services Administration that just removed Kaspersky from the eligible manufacturers listing? The one that controls who's software is eligible for GOVT use.


Do you see strikeforce on the list? Me either, means their products are not eligible to do business with the govt. Doesn't matter who is a distributer for whom, They have to be on eligible MANUFACTURERS listing. You know, since they MAKE the product.

Lets check to see if they even are eligible for REVIEW

Quote:Entity

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Status: Inactive

Expand Search Result for STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
DUNS: 072960938 CAGE Code: 3FC71
Has Active Exclusion?: No DoDAAC:
Expiration Date: 10/07/2010 Debt Subject to Offset? No
Purpose of Registration: All Awards

but in order to do business with the federal government, you must have an active SAM registration.

Nope, still havn't even made the first step in getting ready for govt use.