This post is typed by JJ36. The post and account I made earlier was removed because I wasn't aware of the 1 account per household rule- This is my mother's account, however we are both separate shareholders, and I apologize for any confusion. Here is the post I made earlier:
Part 1
As a general response to Mark's postings and all the following replies, I would like to bring up a few additional points. First, I don't understand why some of you are both thanking and eagerly awaiting Mark's response. In my opinion, he's out completely. His post has caused uncertainty, potentially destabilized the stock price, might bring on another caveat emptor, and by his own admission he isn't current with what the company is doing. At this point, I wouldn't consider anything he says to be valid or reliable, and he's also caused me to be concerned about the current business model of the company. I've got quite a few shares of the company, and it's all of my money, and when I invested, I felt like I was investing in a concrete, well thought out idea/ business model. I felt like I knew what Cableclix was doing and what direction they were heading in. Now, after Mark's post, I honestly have no idea. Maybe the business model and idea is the same, maybe it's slightly changed, or maybe it's drastically changed. I don't know, and that concerns me. I don't know what my money is backing anymore. At this point it's a necessity that the company, not Mark, make a press release with in-depth clarification on what the company is doing. I want to know what my money is supporting.
Part 2
In addition to my previous post, I would also like to add a concise list of some important questions that the company ought to answer.
1. What, exactly, is the business model now? Is the focus on a box, an app, both, or something new?
2. How is the company handling Mark's absence? Is there a void that needs to be filled now that he's gone? Is it already taken care of?
3. Is Mark under contract to keep private company secrets concerning the idea and product so that he doesn't take that information to a competitor with virtually unlimited funding and beat CCLX to the punch? Along those lines, has the company gotten a patent approved yet?
4. Assuming the previous business model is still current, how much progress is there? The cable boxes are already behind- status update?
5. Following my previous point, how are negotiations going with local networks? Is that still part of the business model?
Finally, it's obvious that for whatever reason the company will not be launching "on or about Q2" as the website says. Delays and problems are perfectly understandable, but if the date has been pushed back then stockholders and potential customers should be kept up to date with the new timeline. The website needs to be kept up to date, since currently it displays seemingly outdated information and therefore a lack of comprehensive management.
