The same 3-5% of the combined entity that TAUG would always get.
He never stated 3-5%, that is your figures and those figures are dumb
Companies with $200 million market caps don't merge with companies like TAUG
Up and coming companies certainly do reverse mergers, why not. I read Zortrax website and that company has progressed so much in 2 years that if it wants to go public through an IPO it could be successful today. Two years ago that may have not been the case. aren't there other potential Zortrax companies out there?
"Speaking of Mr. Berman, I am going to go out on a limb and guess by the next quarterly he might just have to be informing the investing public if there is an SEC investigation."
If I had to put money on it Berman is under investigation. Someone with the balls to sue a judge and inform a court about fraud would not have any issues filing an SEC complaint or a libel lawsuit. Berman was a BOD of TAUG and appears to be quite a loser.
By the way, how many people know that paid consultant John Cesario spent time in jail for threatening children, told to stop by a Federal judge, and then he kept on doing it (
I also would like to see links to any court case, police case child service case where he was found to threaten children. Where does it state a Federal judge told him to stop threatening children?
There is also this lawsuit that if TAUG wins, and wins the entire $4 million they are claiming (never mind the $20 million promised by paid consultant John Cesa), the effect on TAUG stock will be a whopping $0.0016.
What makes you state the lawsuit tops out at $ 4 million. Stating that the value of TAUG would go up $0.0016 is erroneous. If you want to think that fine, but I doubt others will. TAUG does have a product and while it is not as fancy as diabetic strips that can barely penetrate a multi billion market even though it is much cheaper than the name brand; nonetheless TAUG's product has potential. Not to mention some type of potential reverse merger.
AI
