No, I think you're wrong. They definitely had positive cash flow for q1. Just look at the statement of cash flows. It's very clear in looking at that. Can you not somehow can see that it's possible that a piece of boilerplate legalese didn't get updated during the final edits of the queue? That seems much more likely than saying that someone fabricated an entire statement of cash flow.
Why are you so dead-set on saying that they had negative cash flow? Seems like it would be a positive thing to see the company making improvements like that, no? Not sure why you insist on saying that someone is lying when creating the Q. I don't see any evidence that the reality of the statements that were filed with the SEC can back up what you're trying to say.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.