InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 366
Posts 11945
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 10/31/2007

Re: SurgeGuy2.0 post# 91125

Friday, 07/21/2017 7:57:14 AM

Friday, July 21, 2017 7:57:14 AM

Post# of 97040
Not exactly, IMO. Allow me to point out a few things. The CEO, for one, does not have controlling interest in the stock. Therefore, a decision to R/S probably would not originate with him. Other Insiders (former and current) own approximately 1.6B shares; or at least they did last time a financial was published.

Though arguably recalcitrant, I wouldn't go so far as to say the aforementioned individuals are obtuse. Meaning, they could have easily ran a series of PR's long ago, touting even the slightest of accomplishments, subsequently unloading to the tune of hundreds of thousands of $$$, in the process...they did not and have not. So, there's no need to R/S (whereby raising the requisite red flag) then dilute, as they could simply follow the usual "Pinky" prescription and dilute now; if that were indeed management's end-goal or intent.

WLAN