Read the first sentence and the last sentence and I basically said D'Couto lied.
Now if I thought D'Couto told the truth that the lab was assisting him and creating a conflict of interest , I would not have said D'Couto lied.
There is no backtracking. A simple choice, if D'Couto told the truth it would have been a conflict of interest on the part of the lab.
1st time I said it:
"Interestingly enough, I found a PATENT ( pun intended ) untruth in NEAH's hype about the DOE submission and Grant. "
2nd time alluded to it:
"From Argonne:
“It’s a scientific discipline, but how you make it can be an art form,” Bloom said. “Once you figure out how to produce it, it’s very re-produceable.”
He said he’s unfamiliar with Neah’s PowerChip, but looks forward to working on it.
Extensive review/Unfamiliar which is it ?
3rd time:
Hmmm NEAH claims support before the submission, DOE says that is a conflict of interest....
fishy fishy D'Couto, no wonder he went dark, every time he opens his mouth...an untruth escapes.
There is no backtracking.
Learn to read.
JMHO
Bill
