InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 119
Posts 10527
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/27/2015

Re: (SHUNNED) post# 46615

Monday, 07/17/2017 7:03:48 PM

Monday, July 17, 2017 7:03:48 PM

Post# of 107737
Let's Explain it this way:

"Item 7.01 - Regulation FD Disclosure."

Is description of 8-k and according to Wikipedia is Regulation Fair Disclosure,[1] also commonly referred to as Regulation FD or Reg FD, is a regulation that was promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in August 2000.[2] The rule mandates that all publicly traded companies must disclose material information to all investors at the same time.

The regulation sought to stamp out selective disclosure, in which some investors (often large institutional investors) received market moving information before others (often smaller, individual investors).

Regulation FD fundamentally changed how companies communicate with investors by bringing more transparency and more frequent and timely communications, perhaps more than any other regulation in the history of the SEC.


"Lawsuit Against Jerome Dewald and Skip Sanzeri

On July 14, 2017, the Company and its Chief Executive Officer, Daniel Yazbeck, filed a complaint in Superior Court of California against Jerome Dewald, Skip Sanzeri and twenty-five (25) persons or entities whose true identities are currently unknown to the Company (collectively, the “Defendants”). Mr. Sanzeri was the Chief Operating Officer of the Company in 2014 and 2015. The Defendants allegedly made false statements about the Company, its products, and Mr. Yazbeck on online investor platforms and at investor events. In addition, the Defendants allegedly, by sending a demand letter for $205,000, attempted to extort money from the Company. Based on these alleged actions, the causes of action in the lawsuit are: (i) trade libel; (ii) defamation; (iii) false light; (iv) intentional interference with prospective business relations; (v) negligent interference with prospective business relations; (vi) intentional interference with contract; (vii) unfair competition pursuant to a California statute; (viii) civil extortion; and (viii) breach of fiduciary duty. The Company is seeking general damages of $29 million, special damages, punitive damages, an injunction to prevent the Defendants from engaging in the unlawful and unfair business practices alleged in the complaint, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs."

I'm interpreting this as the Former CEO and others spreading lies and creating bribes, exc. The company is suing for 29 million, lawsuits are almost high-balled and actual would be settled for less

"Crown Bridge Conversion of Promissory Note

On November 14, 2016, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) and Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $35,000 (the “Note”) with Crown Bridge Partners, LLC (“Crown”) pursuant to which Crown funded $31,500 to the Company after the deduction of a $3,500 original issue discount and $1,500 for legal fees. The Note bore interest at the rate of 8% and was to be repaid on or before November 14, 2017 (the “Maturity Date”). Through 180 days after the date of the Note’s issuance (the “Prepayment Deadline”), the Company could repay the Note at a premium to the amount outstanding at the time of prepayment (as determined in the Note). The Note was able to be converted by Crown at any time after the six (6) month anniversary of the Note into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to 50% of the market price (as determined in the Note)."

I'm interpreting this as a small bill for MYDX that can be (was) paid in stock for half the value of the stock. Probably means Crown is expecting MYDX stock to at least doubling shortly after being paid in shares to take that offer. The next statement seems to indicate that they were paid in shares and may have cashed out early, which was a violation of the terms for not waiting the 6 month period as agreed to


"On April 30, 2017, the Company sent an initial payoff request to Crown so that it could repay the amount due pursuant to the Note (including all penalties and interest) prior to the Prepayment Deadline. Subsequently, between May 9 th and June 4 th , the Company sent further requests for such wire instructions. Despite such requests, on July 3, 2017, Crown converted $36,749.04 (the entire amount due pursuant to the Note including all penalties and interest) into 14,699,616 shares of the Company’s common stock. In light of the Company’s notification required in the SPA to repay the Note pursuant to its terms, the Company believes Crown may have breached the terms of the Note.



The information contained in this Item 7.01 shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and such information is not incorporated by reference into any registration statements or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Exchange Act, regardless of the general incorporation language contained in such filing, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference to this filing."

Good luck to all on this, I loaded up today, Things are starting to look real good here IMHO. Go MYDX$$$$$

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.