InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 2195
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/30/2012

Re: nojay post# 23747

Saturday, 07/15/2017 11:43:17 PM

Saturday, July 15, 2017 11:43:17 PM

Post# of 30168
I included what the PR said in my last post.

1. Before the application was ever submitted D'Couto claimed that the National Lab had completed an extensive review of the NEAH battery under an NDA. In that same PR he claims that they are working with NEAH and the DOE to pursue DOE funding with the company , see below from the PR.

"Separately, the Company noted that it was submitting for U.S. Department of Energy funding with an internationally reputed national laboratory in the USA. The national laboratory, after extensive review of the technology under non-disclosure agreement with the Company, has agreed to pursue DOE funding with the Company. The grant submissions are due in mid-February 2016."

This is not me saying it or misconstruing it, this is a NEAH PR.

The rules for the SBV are clear I already posted them once.

The labs DO NOT work with anyone to help them get the grants.

NO comprehension failure, just a management and PR failure as always.

Besides, if the National Lab was so hot to get the NEAH battery going as D'Couto claimed, what happened in the 2nd half of 2016 and the first half of 2017 ?

JMHO

Bill

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.