InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 4930
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 05/12/2005

Re: None

Tuesday, 09/12/2006 11:00:15 PM

Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:00:15 PM

Post# of 315345
Essential to the use of such a strategy is that it is first established in the corporation's charter. Among other details, these charters specify shareholders' rights. They specify that companies can issue preferred stock—shares that give special dividends, or payments—to their holders. When a takeover bid begins, the company's board of directors issues this preferred stock to its current shareholders. The stock is essentially worthless and is intended to scare away the aggressor. If the takeover succeeds, the stock becomes quite valuable. It can then be redeemed for a very good price or it can be converted into stock of the new controlling company—namely, the aggressor's. Both scenarios leave the aggressor with the choice of either buying the stock at a high price or paying huge dividends on it. This is the pill's poison.

Just some info i've been looking into about "poison pills." Hopefully the above bolded words are not the case. If this is what's going on, then, lets hope for a buyout.