UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[I_Am_Ram]

More delays? lol this is built into the court schedule. This isn't new. We just didn't see it. What this is, after reading Chanbond's responses and exhibits from 5/17/17 is:

Cisco went to find a new expert since Wechselberger (their old expert) told them he'd testify since indeed the parts to the patent are ordinary art. Then at trial they asked him the difficulty of putting them together and he said extraordinarily difficult and then they asked if he (the expert) had ever considered doing it they way the patent described and he said no. So their first expert testified against him.

Now Cisco went and got a new expert to write a declaration of his opinion and he essentially came up with the same exact answer. He even referred to Wechselberger's deposition saying he agrees with it on point 90 in exhibit 2002. Now Cisco wants to get a deposition from him (an oral interview) to try and get him to say something they can use (a prayer).

Documents can be found here:

https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/PTAB/IPR2016-01744/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._7941822/

If you follow IPR cases like me you know that around this time in an appeal is when they terminate and settle. At least when they've explored every option of defense and lost. This is that point. On Friday the deposition will be conducted and posted after or sometime next week. We will see what their second expert had to say in a transcript. If there's nothing Cisco can use this is over. It'll settle within a month in my opinion.