InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 176
Posts 6768
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/26/2012

Re: None

Sunday, 06/25/2017 1:24:40 PM

Sunday, June 25, 2017 1:24:40 PM

Post# of 730288
~ Yes' to, Answer Your Question ~

as they are associated with WaMu' (encompassing) the Original WMI Issued Preferred Security Trusts, and the now reorganized WMI, to WMIH-Corp' ... along with WMI Investment Corp. and the Trusts Supporting the WMB Noteholder Program,

The return of any funds associated within a needed settlement dispute', is very well defined in each class defining Trust Prospectus' ... the appropriate actions to be taken for payments of any dispute, are specifically defined' ...

either in the case of a designated servicing bank, needing to be seized by the OTS / FDIC ... ? ... or, in the event that any individual Trust (ABS-Cert) finds the need to file individually for bankruptcy protection' ... no stone is left unturned' ...

The presentations that have been being made' ... by and where ?, well' everyone knows I'm sure' ... are not factually correct on numerous levels' ...

I would say that it was the possible result of one never taking the time to study a Class Determinative Supporting Trust Prospectus' ... however' ... in my own opinion, I believe that the misdirection and misrepresentations are driven by a much deeper agenda' ...

ADDED: ... Just to be clear though, ... the FDIC-C's allowed DB' general unsecured claim against the FDIC-R' for some $3 Billion dollars is quite a long ways away from DB' ever receiving any money for their "Allegations" of poor performance' ...

The allowed "Administrative Expense"' and the, General Unsecured Claim are quite different' ...

AZ
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News