Thursday, June 22, 2017 12:52:38 PM
In the first sign of shake up as a result of the supreme court decision relative to disgorgement, the division is advising the commission to reduce the disgorgement.
However, the irony here is that the commission never asked the division on record to provide an opinion. It will be odd if the commission would accept a filing that they never asked for after the deadline. I am not a law expert but it did not make sense to me. The deadline to submit anything was May 15. Wouldn't this be considered interference????!
This is like saying, hey Commission, here what we like you to do because we know better.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17104-event-148.pdf
By the way. this whole thing could be waste of time anyway, with DC full circuit court due to make a decision on administrative law judges constitutionality and later by the supreme court!!!! So, this is far from over unless the comission dissmisses the case all together. They have an opportunity to do so now since the ALJ did not respect the digorgement 5 year limitation to start with
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM