Monty:
I suppose the question I have is:
If the Cisco 13 can't decide an equitable division of the total settlement for each, would the courts even care and have them make the payment and figure that out later OR could the parties stall the trial process until that equitable division is determined?
I know the courts would not allow this to continue on and on, but would this be taken into consideration as a tactic to stall out the process for a year,,,two years,,,?
I could imagine new suits to be filed by some of the parties against some of the other parties as they don't agree on the 'equitable distribution'. I realize that is not a Chanbond or UOIP problem, but one the courts could review and agree to a continuance of the case until that matter is determined?
