InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,537.02
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
19,641.60
(
0.83%
)
Dow Jones
39,308.00
(
-0.06%
)
Brent Oil
87.33
(
0.48%
)
Bitcoin
58,468.74
(
-2.82%
)
Post# of 108590
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

specutator

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 83
Posts 13525
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/19/2009

specutator

Re: INSTATRADER post# 80771

Friday, 06/16/2017 12:35:06 PM

Friday, June 16, 2017 12:35:06 PM

Post# of 108590

...too simplistic a view regarding O/S..

That view was the future use of the A/S after the 1.83 billion shares were reversed split down to 18.3 million in the O/S.

If the 5 Billion A/S is used to compare the two SPCL/Pixelmags changes (2.1 billion A/S reduced to 210 million), then the SPCL/Pixelmags/Migme O/S would be much higher than the 18.3 million of SPCL and anyone holding those future changes would be concerned, in my opinion.

Not comparing companies at all, but BAC has 10B outstanding...

In your example, BAC has over a trillion dollars of assets ($2.187 Trillion) and $87.9 billion of revenue, so I would never compare BAC O/S to SPCL/Pixelmags O/S.

Notice I used revenue above.

My posted comments are only my considered opinion based on the reality as I see it. Your reality may be different.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up