InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 762
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2003

Re: ELI_R post# 41002

Wednesday, 08/13/2003 9:26:06 PM

Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:26:06 PM

Post# of 432654
Nice thought:

"How about the "external resources" being our government representatives from Pennsylvania putting some pressure on the big foreign bully against our little U.S. company?"

But it doesn't pass the rationality test. Before our government could get involved it would have to be shown that infringement is taking place. That hasn't been demonstrated and yet people often forget that important fact.

All we have is management saying they "believe" their IPR is embedded in the standards, no one knows whether it's true or not. Without a court judgement that infringement is taking place, our government would look ridiculous getting involved. It's IDCC's word against theirs. That won't change unless the manufacturers have a change of heart or IDCC files suit (and prevails).

Once



The best way to convince a fool that he is wrong is to let him have his own way.

~ ~ ~ Josh Billings

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News