InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 167
Posts 21763
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2006

Re: pantherj post# 10298

Tuesday, 06/13/2017 11:37:51 AM

Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:37:51 AM

Post# of 24672
The TA is not gagged. Gagging implies that the company has ordered the TA to not provide share information to their shareholders. The implication is that the company is hiding something from shareholders.

When a TA 'self-gags' there is NO implication that the company is hiding something from shareholders. Therefore it is not accurate to say that they are being gagged - as that implies something that is not the case. The implication is not verifiable and therefore is not a credible claim.

It is misleading to say that the TA is gagged, and is more accurate to say that they are not gagged by the company, but have a policy to not report to individual shareholders. It's a conservative approach to avoid the hassles that come with such reporting.

<<Any contention that the TA was not chosen specifically by the company because it gags itself is both unprovable and utterly ridiculous. >>

Any contention that the TA WAS chosen specifically by the company because it gags itself is also unprovable. Unverifiable claims that they chose them because they 'self-gag' are not credible.