noone said mig was a sub of foxconn. because they were never a sub of foxconn. You are right, they were/are invested in mig, 18%, they have likely written off that investment since that is about to be cut in at least half upon completion of the merger with spcl.
FIH was a sub of foxconn according to that bloomberg description.
You've managed to confuse yourself here. congrats.
I have no such trisomy of 21. but im older than the age of 22-23 (unlike yourself)
all you did was assume that I was referring to mig when i said SPCL absored a sub of foxconn, which makes an ass out of you.
just look at the links that greenmachine and I posted. The merger/acquisition section where MIG was mentioned likely means that FIH refinanced/recapitalized their investment with SPCL.
Now you Dwyane me, now you Dwon't
