InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 88
Posts 4493
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 12/03/2009

Re: Stoopidyoshi post# 69446

Tuesday, 06/06/2017 9:52:41 PM

Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:52:41 PM

Post# of 207119
JB&ZJMY doesn't make any sense for a "ticker".
JBZH9#, 9# as just a "place holder" until it becomes
official does.

Sounds like other brokerages using the same "9#"
that, it's already in their system & just waiting an official confirmation on a NEW "ticker"= JBZH.

If "the initial name change filing has failed",
If "the initial filing wasnt accepted",
Two conflicting statements about two completely different things.

The Scott rep is the confused one if they believe a ticker of=
JB&ZJMY is acceptable.



Cheers

Avast ye Mateys, a statement of plunder is not upon ye,
only missing sails & lazy seamanship upon thy keel.

They hoist the Jolly Roger upon ye,

So B