I just read your entire sticky, and the post that you were responding to (from Darth Yoda). You were both giving your interpretation of the situation. In fact, your very first sentence is "My interpretation of the no-action review available for issuers is different."
You clearly have very strong opinions about this...and I'm not downplaying them in any way. But at least please concede that the sticky is your interpretation, and swayed largely by your opinions.
AND AGAIN...I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that. I understand that as a moderator you are entitled to share your opinions, regardless of what they may be ("Them's the rules," according to one of the other moderators that I discussed this with). But, they are opinions.
