Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[Dell_Griffith]

No, no, no not HOPE. No such thing in my vernacular. I like to deal in reasonable logic, but the below is "HOPE." However, it was SO far off-base it defies reasonable logic. There's really no foundation for it - at all:

Eagle1947 Monday, 10/10/16 01:40:18 PM

Post #98003
Please put me down for .1467, LQMT's high for the upcoming year.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125697031

When a rational view is taken on this situation one needs to balance Li and Chung's "investment" with the fact that the share price is mired and has in fact lost almost 20% for the poor folks (suckers?) who recently bought in at $.32c.

Good gosh, I hope those that bought in the single digits didn't sell off at .1467 based on the affirmations of those in-the-know calling that the "high" for 2017. If investors followed that logic, they would have gotten burned pretty bad.

So now .32 is bad? How bad is it for those that sold off at .1467? That's ugly.

I don't know, but shouldn't Lugee be given the benefit of the doubt since he said Q3 and we're still in May? Or should we just call him a liar - just like the "Chinese Scam" or "the funds weren't coming in" or Lugee has only self-interest in China, but he goes and buys a building for 8 mill of his own money to put two machines in it.

I guess there are different definitions of "HOPE," as in hope the deal was a scam, hope the funds weren't coming in, hope that Lugee is going to stick it to common shareholder or hope that the price is topping out at .1467 for 2017. Now THAT is "HOPE." That "HOPE" is batting .000. Never fault a guy for trying and the more AB's, the better the chance of getting a hit - I hate to see anyone batting zero, so I hope so, but the hope is going to have to do a 180 to get over the .000.

GL.