InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/18/2003

Re: Dan3 post# 6666

Tuesday, 08/12/2003 10:11:18 AM

Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:11:18 AM

Post# of 151682
Dan3,

They released the information about the fraud that had been bapco, and Intel never let out so much as a peep about the acusation that Intel had been defrauding customers with rigged benchmarks. Had there been any explanation other than the obvious one - Intel was a crooked company...

This is the second time in a few days you use this "logic" to prove your facts. Here is the other:

It's well documented fact, and Intel hasn't dared to contadict it.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1308302

So since Intel does not respond to every accusation thown its way, the accusations are true and so they become "facts". Give me a break.

Let's see, it was not OJ, the fact is, it was Andy Grove, since we have yet to see Andy deny it.

Here's another fact. Jerry Sanders posts on SI and IHub. Unless you show me a link or a "post" were he denies it :)

IMHO
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News