InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 4034
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/15/2016

Re: brooklyn13 post# 162258

Friday, 05/12/2017 9:09:14 AM

Friday, May 12, 2017 9:09:14 AM

Post# of 235079
If "a third party is underwriting the whole she-bang" there might be a third possibility! It (read TPG) wants SFOR to prevail in court. Once it is completely assurred of the validity of SFOR IP it buys out SFOR.
I have to go back to the April Bloomberg TV interview with a TPG partner who clearly stated TPG's intent over the rest of this year when he said
"We will be acquiring small, computer software companies in the cyber security landscape." (Does SFOR meet that description?) I also know both multi-billion dollar Intel and TPG used the Ropes and Gray's mergers and acquisition office to spin off McAfee as a pure-play, stand alone, computer security play. Now McAfee is good anti-virus software. However, it has an Achillie's heel like all others, lack of zero day attack protection. SFOR can be the armor to fill that gap. All three SFOR, Intel and Texas Pacific Group sharing the same expensive law firm could make that happen easily.