InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 2138
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2011

Re: None

Thursday, 05/11/2017 8:20:22 PM

Thursday, May 11, 2017 8:20:22 PM

Post# of 24336
And PS for those who find this garbage management aggravating,

You may still get yours. They have been working very hard to make the claim

That they are responsible for the tech but in actuality, NASA's fairly

Brilliant research scientist Jin Li spent decades in this, and any refinements

Are exactly that: mere refinements and extensions of the true tech she created.

They've been working very hard to legitimize their efforts as "co-creators" of the tech, imo,

And my guess is that when they reach a certain point, they can legally make claim that

Their Nanobeak medical tech is unique, and should be separated from the MJ sensor

Tech. But it's shaky-- a spit-cleaner doesn't make it different.

The science fundamentals remain the same, and our (sub) licensing was to reach

For MEDICAL applications, not the MJ bone. We will see but my prediction is RS for those

That can be diluted(us), announcement of aN MJ business spin off, and they head to millions

In medical diagnostics with all

Of us shed off the back. When this happens, someone should file a suit, for that's not what

We've been buying into for (in some cases) some time, all imo. Watch carefully for the

Sleight of hand is near, all imo. I want to be wrong....I do, so show me.

SD