InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 2979
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2015

Re: Gamesc post# 116939

Thursday, 05/11/2017 12:09:58 AM

Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:09:58 AM

Post# of 232912
Thanks for the reply, the last paragraph spells it out clearly, Eontec IP not part of the MTA.

I can understand your point regarding Apple’s concerns over Eontec using its own IP in CE, But that already happens now, Eontec already manufactures parts for CE out of its own BMG.

As an example, Samsung/Google have blatantly violated Apple’s Design and OS patents but Apple has been powerless to stop them or get any compensation payment, and Apple has no choice but to keep using Samsung as a supplier.

Based on what Samsung and Google are getting away with, i can’t see how Apple could stop Eontec when they are Not infringing on CIP when using Eontec IP and Alloy, and then theres that cheap BMG that Li owns and no doubt Apple wants. Then there is the patent protection Eontec gives CIP/Apple in China.

So Apple’s grip on the ol crown jewels will feel more like a ….. ah … helping hand perhaps.

The Only Difference Between a Short-Term and
Long-Term Investment is Stock Performance.
~Unknown.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News