Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[AZCowboy]

~ Mr Panda, No, I Guess Not ~

Is there certain concern that you have regarding this?

In your opinion, does DB probate exit trigger final resolution of the FDIC receivership? I thought last year settlement settles all remaining suits against the FDIC receivership. Am I missing anything else?

... Actually, No' I believe that you are doing just fine' ...

I have also followed the "dual tracking" litigation going on in Judge Collyer's Court for some time now' ... The Original Claims were filed just ahead of the original bar date, ... on, Dec 30th, 2008' ... and then, moved toward the opening of active litigation on March 20th, 2009' ... WMI II (the WMB Action)

In My Opinion ?, ... This particular WMI II (the WMB Action) litigation, opening in D.C in Judge Collyer's Court, became active litigation simultaneously' with the Original WMI (the WMI Action) filed in Judge Walraths' Court, which lead to Filing # 5885, Nov 2010' which described the charges placed against the FDIC, which then lead to the "the Settlement" ...

What I am saying is that, ... what appears to be the intentional distractions, are becoming quite obvious' ... and Yes' ... I do see the "third party" litigation in the Cal' Probate Court as a convenient ... "distraction" ...

The August 19th, 2016 Settlement' ... ? ... appears to have the correct case number' and the correct parties to the settlement' associated with the actual case' which would be, WMI / JPMC / FDIC' ... only' ...

anyone else, would ? or should be considered a "third party" ... as Judge Collyer had actually Ruled' ...

Keep up the Good Work' and Thank You

AZ