InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 113
Posts 16413
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2011

Re: rige post# 116534

Tuesday, 05/09/2017 1:36:48 PM

Tuesday, May 09, 2017 1:36:48 PM

Post# of 233022
Wiggle room not being granted.

Again, sir, the subject at hand was and is the SEC requirement for quarterly filings. Nothing to do with the topic you introduced about LQMT charter. Read the origin of the thread.

My entitlement comes from the government, not LQMT.

Big difference.

In fact, two totally different subjects.

To stay on topic we need to discuss the SEC FILINGS requirements for publicly held companies. When we return to where the thread started, we will be back on topic. Thank you.

I will be happy to discuss your interest in the LQMT charter some other time, when necessary. However, that is not the subject at hand.

SEC REGULATIONS is the topic at hand.

Should be clear to most investors.

The inference of something based upon what was thought to be implied is not a solid foundation for making a conclusion.

WATT the SEC requires for public companies is good enough for me.

Tell me again and again that I am not entitled to what is filed with the SEC. This is the misunderstanding at hand. Nothing to do with LQMT's charter. Nothing, NADA, NIENTE, NICHTS, zen zen arimasen, BU SHI, NE, Anie, rien,

I am entitled to read the public filings of the SEC.

Show me the link where I am denied reading of a quarterly SEC FILING. You can't.

CAVEAT EMPTOR

Do we really have to listen to this rant all over again? STFU

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News