InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 20
Posts 6407
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2011

Re: None

Tuesday, 05/09/2017 10:01:02 AM

Tuesday, May 09, 2017 10:01:02 AM

Post# of 52845
New clause (statement) on GERS web site(?):

GreenShift’s patented process is installed at over 80% of the corn-based, dry mill ethanol facilities in the United States, producing roughly 1.8 billion pounds and over $700 million in annual revenue.
http://www.greenshift.com/products/corn_oil_extraction

When the heck did this happen, not the inclusion of the paragraph, but cornering (80%) of this portion of the corn oil extraction industry? Assuming a paltry royalty of 10% that would be $70 million in revenue to GERS. Assume the OS count is 20 million (listed as 14 million today on Yahoo), that would be $3.5 per share in revenue. This simply cannot be correct as it would translate into a PPS in the range of $24.50 - $98.00

More likely is that the phrase "is installed" does not mean installed in royalty paying customers, but in all operations including those that are infringing.

Regardless of the interpretation, if they are not out and out lying, this is an objective measure of what is at stake in this litigation/mediation. And why I believe that GERS/C&C will be demanding more than can be accommodated in a mediation and why I believe that the settlement discussions will fail; going through with the appeal will be bring GERS/C&C this huge windfall.