What-En-Blazes - Sensibility in Projections is Falling Fast
First of all, who cares if it is 6.7% or 10%, not worth the time to debate, we only have rounded numbers, so impossible to determine actual.
SCRIPT COUNT IN MARCH WAS ACTUALLY MORE, AGAIN, but this was already known, because I know you have this calculation, and still a choice was made in this post to present in a way that made it look less.
March 2016 18,600/28 working days = 664.3
March 2017 18,500/27 working days = 685.2
So increase in scripts per working day was 20.9 x 27 working days = 564 scripts increase in March 2017 over March 2016, and that isn’t even considering the transition from 30 day scripts to 90 day scripts that took place in the last year. Which makes us look even better!!!
Quote: THE SCRIPT COUNT WAS LESS AND THE COSTS WERE MORE – It was the script price that increased 6.7%. If the Script prices remained the same this March Revenue would have been less.
You know this how?
Taking this bulletproof, LOL, analysis to every month in 2017. So now the Revenue percentage increase for the month of March is being used to determine how much PharmCo increased the price of scripts to get an increase in revenue to make them look better. So since PharmCo had a 6.7% increase in revenue for March, this was just the result of increases in the prices charged to their consumers. Well if that is true, then I guess the company increased the price of scripts for January by 23% and thought what the heck let’s increase prices by 36% for February, and then thought, man we are looking too good on revenue, so let’s increase our prices by only 6.7% for March. This is just a laughable analysis and conclusion.
The rest of the calculations have been proven inaccurate, so not addressing AGAIN.
If Pete and Repeat are in a boat and Pete falls out, who's left? Answer: If Pete and Repeat are in a boat and Pete falls out, who's left?
