InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,459.10
(
1.11%
)
US TECH 100
18,514.00
(
1.00%
)
Dow Jones
40,589.34
(
1.64%
)
Brent Oil
79.75
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
68,035.58
(
0.34%
)
Post# of 222547
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

KOmani

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 34
Posts 2556
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/22/2015

KOmani

Re: janice shell post# 120838

Monday, 05/01/2017 9:27:51 AM

Monday, May 01, 2017 9:27:51 AM

Post# of 222547
The property that the company operates from (the property is in the wives name) faces foreclosure:

http://www.poconorecord.com/article/20150628/news/150629490

This suggests the case against the bank in January was decided in favor of the bank (I am pretty sure):

https://casetext.com/case/keb-hana-bank-united-states-v-red-mansion-llc

The recent promotional efforts started in March.

While not 100% linked with NSAV, I would think that is quite the coincidence in the court case ending with the wives company and then the promotional efforts beginning for the husband's company.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up