InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 1459
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/08/2012

Re: I_Am_Ram post# 159422

Sunday, 04/30/2017 6:47:23 PM

Sunday, April 30, 2017 6:47:23 PM

Post# of 235130
In this ocean of posts,

So The article author mentions "dilution" and the guy next door thinks SFOR is a little crappy Pink sheet and one would only lose money in.

Both obviously have not studied SFOR in-depth, the author knowing part of the story and having written on it in the past, is still far from knowing in-depth Knowlege or would have mention a lot more postives.

And given 4SD's reply, and the fact that Kay has stated several times in 2016 & 2017 that there's no need for a R/S, not to mention, that a buyback has more potential of happening.

Without a link given to the thread for ease of reading it, I see no reason to go look for it. If you had given the ease of just clicking a link I would be much more likely to have followed the discussion thread, and read your comments, even though as to the reasons mentioned above, it may be pointless.

Anyone who is long, courteous to others and provided knowledgeable insight to the board, I always will take tge time to read if requested. But I dig enough searching for DD, without having to go looking for posts, when 20 seconds taken to provide a link would entice a look at your view point.