I think there are many people who are bitter at selling for a tax loss considering they would still be in the game for a nice pay day. I don't know what to make of Condoe but he or she appears elusive, evasive, and vague. What I do know is that I though the responses by the Fibertower and AT&T attorneys to the petitioners that came from the Bankruptcy angle were very weak and Levy and Fahy did a great job in their replies of pointing that out. Generally the FCC is very strict on the petition and reply process but they let some very weak ones roll on in to be publicly posted. Obviously Levy and Fahy stood out with their thoughts and rationale and I think the FCC will take serious notice of what they submitted especially regarding the potential abuse and fraud in the BK courts. As I have stated the Tom Scott Issue should be in the spotlight. You simply cannot have one individual so biased from all angles being defendant, plaintiff, judge, jury, and executioner on a single matter. $300M to $1M valuation of wireless spectrum assets within the course of one year and you have been driving the entire process??? Was the Judge more concerned about his cushy position at a law firm and his golf game while all this was going on? After the unsecured creditors valuation and the SEALED FLYYN DOCUMENT the judge should have had an unbiased party do the valuation work. That in itself is cause to reopen the BK case and the fact that 94% of the assets have sat in limbo means...how could the plan ever have been consummated?
