JL! What a GREAT explanation of the ruling! You finally admit that the TESOROS titles are not in your name....LOL!(1. Titles TESOROS are in the name of Barrick's not known EMPLOYEE...
So....let's see if I get this right......More crooked judges, crooked secretaries,bribes, crooked politicians,thugs, Gang bankers, crooked daughter in law, more removed judges/court employees,losers eating crow by the metric ton.....and last but not least...you "welcome liars to cream them with facts". Well all in all this is just a repeat of about 500 posts of yours.....
NOW..... can you give us your spin on THIS section of the ruling? THANKS!
"...and having also present the plaintiff’s own evidence allows you to check that he does not have the owner’s quality of the right that it invokes, one cannot but conclude that the plaintiff has no active standing to implore the lawsuit attempted."
