ViaDerma Inc (VDRM)

[Mistral]

This isn't a patent case. It's a contract case. Here is the link that supports it is valid, not junk, and related to the contract law.

https://www.pacermonitor.com/case/21120838/Keough_v_Otiko_et_al

Keough is a subject matter expert on patent law including contracts and assignments. He wouldn't file this suit if he didn't have standing.

Regarding expiration, there are two Application Numbers for the same patent-pending invention. The top image below shows the one Keough uses. It shows an Information Disclosure Sheet was submitted. The green highlighted entry is the one IG presented for review. No relevance to this message.

My stickie is about a call to the USPTO regarding status. I called the day after this case was filed, without knowing it was filed. The examiner was unable to talk to me about these details.

As for what Otiko and Adams are capable of doing, the word is deceit. Public records show their history. The unbelievable inconsistencies, lies, and manipulation displayed by Otiko in his filings and news releases will be his undoing.

Correct, a full case does not need to be heard. However, if you think a junk case like this is going to get a quick entrance in front of a judge, then you don't have a clue how patent cases work. I admire much of your DD, but I've had too much experience with patent cases to allow you to contend there's a possibility of an injunction here. No chance.

Plus, what's your take on the claim that Keogh's patent claim has expired? I don't fully understand that statement unless it was just patent pending, because I know an approved patent wouldn't have expired this quick. If it was just patent pending, the Otiko knows he has the upper hand.

I will make my be that Otiko can't be that openly blatant to do all the stuff you're accusing him off. Impossible. I think this guy knows what he's doing.