InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 2477
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/02/2015

Re: Urbanlegend post# 6700

Saturday, 04/01/2017 12:55:44 PM

Saturday, April 01, 2017 12:55:44 PM

Post# of 39829
I would argue that the name on the patent isn't as important as contractually reaping half the benefits from it. This is from the financials in the section discussing the deal with VSL.

"The Company shall act as the exclusive agent to facilitate and negotiate any opportunities on behalf of ODT to Companies, Organizations and other qualified entities. Upon any closing, ODT shall receive 50% of gross dollars and the Company shall receive the other 50% at the time of a completion of any transaction opportunity, including legal settlements after subtracting applicable contingent legal fees. The term of the agreement is for the life of the acquired intellectual property."

The same goes for the EA agreement.

"The Company shall act as the exclusive agent to facilitate and negotiate any opportunities on behalf of EA Technology to Companies, Organizations and other qualified entities.

Upon any closing, EA shall receive 50% of gross dollars and the Company shall receive the other 50% at the time of a completion of any transaction opportunity, including legal settlements after subtracting applicable contingent legal fees. In the event the Company sublicenses EA to other entities, profits shall be split evenly 50%/50%.