InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 60
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/28/2016

Re: None

Tuesday, 03/28/2017 10:40:21 AM

Tuesday, March 28, 2017 10:40:21 AM

Post# of 30168
Chris & Co. are DELIBERATELY soft-killing NPWZ because this particular corporate structure has outlived its usefulness.

Or strangling it in the crib, whichever metaphor works best for you.

Chris had a bright idea but he needed money to develop it and get the patents sewn up.

That phase is over, and the shareholders who paid for it will see NOTHING. IMO Chris intends to WALK AWAY with 'his' IP and make himself a tidy fortune. He may indeed be in China looking at manufacturing facilities, as well as scraping up financing.

Chris's REFUSAL to submit a 10k (and it is a refusal, NOT an inability) positively SCREAMS BAD INTENT. At this point I don't even care if the 10k is all zeros--I am focused on Chris and the BOD's ATTITUDE and INTENT for MY company.

Does anyone here have enough of a corporate law background vis a vis the rights of shareholders to corporate IP in cases such as this-extreme malfeasance and malintent? Can we CLAW BACK the IP we paid for?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.