InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 237
Posts 10817
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/17/2006

Re: Pyrrhonian post# 103158

Wednesday, 03/22/2017 10:22:44 AM

Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:22:44 AM

Post# of 425958
Pyrr...

Quote: "R-IT subjects do not have diets high in DHA, which may help counterbalance some of the negative effects of 4g/d EPA
-R-IT subjects are receiving 4g/d EPA, not 1.8g/d EPA. This may exceed an optimal dose threshold, and cause more harm than benefit, especially with regard to its negative impact on HDL-C, HDL2, oxLDL uptake by macrophages, TBARS, serum vit E, and fasting glucose levels, none of which occurs at lower doses."

This is so pathetic...Don't you even understand 4gms/EPA in R=I essentially matches up the EPA/AA ratios (ie the important thing) to the JELIS levels..
Your unsubstantiated statements about the detrimental effects of raising EPA has no scientific basis and is simply a desperate ploy. Time to throw in the towel. You've done everything your master asks ,but the arguments are just too weak...You are standing in the middle of the tracks and the locomotive is coming...

":>) JL
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News