InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 1459
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/08/2012

Re: Jtech post# 144754

Tuesday, 03/21/2017 3:25:09 PM

Tuesday, March 21, 2017 3:25:09 PM

Post# of 235061
Jtech - As my thought on the matter stated

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129729102

"If my thoughts/assumptions were correct, then I could understand, why Kay can't give a Response.

1) Kay could easily answer Yes to your question If R&G were on a contingency basis.

If he answered No, with no explanation, then shareholders might want to know where the Money would come from to Hire such a Prestigious Law Firm.

If indeed TPG was affording or Backing R&G Legal Services to Represent SFOR. That Cat Could Surely Not Be Let Out of the Bag, at least not until the ACS Deals with McAffee were announced.

Hense I can't discuss it. Your adding another factor to my theroy, thanks.

But still there maybe other reasons as well. I just like to added up Facts known as to "ONE" of a few pauseable Theroies. ...

Until Heard from the Houses Mouth, Who Knows...

I Just know Christmas will probably come Early This Year.




I also asked kay if Ropes and Gray was working on contingency and he said he could not discuss it.

Was he the one that told us about blank Rome working on contingency? Why can he tell us about Ropes and Gray?