InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 869
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: rmarchma post# 40061

Wednesday, 08/06/2003 8:02:30 PM

Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:02:30 PM

Post# of 432673
ronny/rox

However IDCC could still have let's say 4 more essential patents aplicable to CDMA2000 and 24 more essential patents for WCDMA, in addition to the 5 sublicensed patents. These additional essential CDMA patents would NOT be subject to indemnification. Therefore a potential licensee would still need an IDCC license to produce standard-compliant CDMA2000 and WCDMA products. However, the potential licensee would want to pay a lower royalty rate so as not to double-pay for the same 5 essential patents, used in my illustration, which are already licensed through the indemnifier.

why is it that QCOM's sh-t dont stink? why can't IDCC adopt the 'license one, license them all' policy just like them?......
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News